MICROSOFT OFFICE ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 64 BIT
If the user can switch to the 32 bit version then that would solve the issue.Īs far as I know, an Access application created in a 32 bit version of Access will not just transfer over to a 64 bit version. A lot would have to change and be recompiled in a 64 bit full version.
MICROSOFT OFFICE ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 INSTALL
On top of that,Īny add ins, like OCXs or DLLs would have to be tested and likely replaced, since most are 32 bit and won't work in a 64 bit scenario.ĭoes anyone have some thoughts on the above?Īs noted, the recommend version of office is x32, and that includes all 圆4 bit versions of windows.Īnd this limitation is not limited to Access, but you cannot install Excel 32 if the machine has Excel 圆4. #MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL 64 BIT# Download Microsoft Access 2010 Runtime from Official.
However, the limitation of “mixing” different bit size of office ONLY applies to the SAME version. >What would happen if then tried to install 4-bit Office? So if the customer has 圆4 2013, then I use the 2010 x32 access runtime.Īnd if they have 圆4 2010, then I install the x32 2013 Access runtime. They will get the same message you get! In other words, whoever (or whatever) version of office is installed first, then from that point on, everything else must follow the same bit size. So if you manage to install Access 2013 x32 on a computer, then any attempt to install office 2013 圆4 will fail. #MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL INSTALL# So the matching up of bit size only applies to the GIVEN version of office. However in all cases, once “one” application of a given bit size is installed, then everything else for that given version of office must follow the same bit size. #MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL UPDATE#.#MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL 64 BIT#.#MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL INSTALL#.#MICROSOFT ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 WILL NOT INSTALL FOR FREE#.